Validity of ImPACT for Measuring Attention and Processing Speed Following Sports-Related Concussion
- Authors: Iverson, Lovell, Collins
- Publication: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Date: May 15, 2006
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, for measuring attention and processing speed in athletes with concussions. This was accomplished by comparing the computerized testing to a traditional neuropsychological measure, the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Participants were 72 amateur athletes who were seen within 21 days of sustaining a sports-related concussion. As predicted, the SDMT correlated most highly with the Processing Speed and Reaction Time composites from ImPACT.
High School Concussions in the 2008-2009 Academic Year
- Authors: William P. Meehan III, MD, Pierre d'Hemecourt, MD, R. Dawn Comstock, PhD
- Publication: The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Date: Jun 02, 2011
Abstract:
Background: An estimated 136 000 concussions occur per academic year in high schools alone. The effects of repetitive concussions
and the potential for catastrophic injury have made concussion an injury of significant concern for young athletes.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to describe the mechanism of injury, symptoms, and management of sport-related concussions
using the High School Reporting Information Online (HS RIO) surveillance system.
Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study.
Methods: All concussions recorded by HS RIO during the 2008-2009 academic year were included. Analyses were performed
using SPSS software. Chi-square analysis was performed for all categorical variables. Statistical significance was considered
for P.05.
Results: A total of 544 concussions were recorded. The most common mechanism (76.2%) was contact with another player,
usually a head-to-head collision (52.7%). Headache was experienced in 93.4%; 4.6% lost consciousness. Most (83.4%) had resolution
of their symptoms within 1 week. Symptoms lasted longer than 1 month in 1.5%. Computerized neuropsychological testing
was used in 25.7% of concussions. When neuropsychological testing was used, athletes were less likely to return to play
within 1 week than those for whom it was not used (13.6% vs 32.9%; P.01). Athletes who had neuropsychological testing appeared
less likely to return to play on the same day (0.8% vs 4.2%; P = .056). A greater proportion of injured, nonfootball athletes
had computerized neuropsychological testing than injured football players (23% vs 32%; P = .02)
Conclusion: When computerized neuropsychological testing is used, high school athletes are less likely to be returned to play
within 1 week of their injury. Concussed football players are less likely to have computerized neuropsychological testing than
those participating in other sports. Loss of consciousness is relatively uncommon among high school athletes who sustain
a sport-related concussion. The most common mechanism is contact with another player. Some athletes (1.5%) report symptoms
lasting longer than 1 month.
Keywords: concussion; sport-related concussion; mild traumatic brain injury; athletic injury; sports
Identifying Neurocognitive Deficits
- Authors: Danny G. Thomas, MD, MPH, Michael W. Collins, PhD, Richard A. Saladino, MD, Virginia Frank,
- Publication: Academic Emergency Medicine 2011
- Date: Jun 02, 2011
Abstract:
Objectives: This study of concussed adolescents sought to determine if a computer-based neurocognitive
assessment (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test [ImPACT]) performed on
patients who present to the emergency department (ED) immediately following head injury would correlate
with assessments performed 3 to 10 days postinjury and if ED neurocognitive testing would detect
differences in concussion severity that clinical grading scales could not.
Methods: A prospective cohort sample of patients 11 to 17 years of age presenting to the ED within
12 hours of a head injury were evaluated using two traditional concussion grading scales and neurocognitive
testing. ED neurocognitive scores were compared to follow-up scores obtained at least 3 days
postinjury. Postconcussive symptoms, outcomes, and complications were assessed via telephone followup
for all subjects.
Results: Sixty patients completed phone follow-up. Thirty-six patients (60%) completed follow-up testing
a median of 6 days postinjury. Traditional concussion grading did not correlate with neurocognitive deficits
detected in the ED or at follow-up. For the neurocognitive domains of verbal memory, processing
speed, and reaction time, there was a significant correlation between ED and follow-up scores trending
toward clinical improvement. By 2 weeks postinjury, 23 patients (41%) had not returned to normal activity.
At 6 weeks, six patients (10%) still had not returned to normal activity.
Conclusions: Immediate assessment in the ED can predict neurocognitive deficits seen in follow-up and
may be potentially useful to individualize management or test therapeutic interventions. Neurocognitive
assessment in the ED detected deficits that clinical grading could not and correlated with deficits at
follow-up.
Neurocognitive and Symptom Predictors of Recovery
- Authors: Brian Lau, BS, Mark R. Lovell, PhD, Michael W. Collins, PhD, Jamie Pardini, PhD
- Publication: Clin J Sport Med Volume 0, Number 0, Month 2009
- Date: Jun 02, 2011
Abstract:
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify specific
symptom and neuropsychological test patterns that might serve as
prognostic indicators of recovery in concussed high school football
players. The recently proposed simple versus complex concussion
classification was examined and specific symptom clusters were
identified.
Design: Case–control study.
Setting: High school football.
Participants: Subjects were 108 recently concussed male high
school football athletes between the ages of 13 and 19 (mean = 16.01)
years.
Assessment of Risk Factors: Participants were evaluated by
utilizing the Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive
Testing computer-based neurocognitive test battery at before injury
and within an average of 2.23 days of injury. All athletes were
followed until they met criteria for clinical recovery.
Main Outcome Measures: Symptom ratings and neurocognitive
test performance.
Results: Both neurocognitive test results and self-reported symptom
data had prognostic value in determining time to clinical recovery.
Self-reported cognitive decline, Immediate Postconcussion Assessment
and Cognitive Testing reaction time, and migraine headache
symptoms were associated with longer time to clinical recovery.
Overall, these difficulties were predictive of concussions that were
retrospectively classified as complex.
Conclusions: Specific symptom clusters and neurocognitive
test results may have predictive value to classifying and managing
concussions.
Key Words: concussion, complex, neurocognitive, symptoms,
simple
Sensitivity and Specificity of Subacute
- Authors: Brian C. Lau, BS, Michael W. Collins, PhD, Mark R. Lovell, PhD
- Publication: The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Date: Jun 02, 2011
Abstract:
Background: Concussions affect an estimated 136 000 high school athletes yearly. Computerized neurocognitive testing has
been shown to be appropriately sensitive and specific in diagnosing concussions, but no studies have assessed its utility to predict
length of recovery. Determining prognosis during subacute recovery after sports concussion will help clinicians more confidently
address return-to-play and academic decisions.
Purpose: To quantify the prognostic ability of computerized neurocognitive testing in combination with symptoms during the subacute
recovery phase from sports-related concussion.
Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: In sum, 108 male high school football athletes completed a computer-based neurocognitive test battery within 2.23
days of injury and were followed until returned to play as set by international guidelines. Athletes were grouped into protracted
recovery (.14 days; n, 50) or short-recovery (14 days; n, 58). Separate discriminant function analyses were performed using
total symptom score on Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, symptom clusters (migraine, cognitive, sleep, neuropsychiatric),
and Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing neurocognitive scores (verbal memory, visual memory, reaction
time, processing speed).
Results: Multiple discriminant function analyses revealed that the combination of 4 symptom clusters and 4 neurocognitive composite
scores had the highest sensitivity (65.22%), specificity (80.36%), positive predictive value (73.17%), and negative predictive value
(73.80%) in predicting protracted recovery. Discriminant function analyses of total symptoms on the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale
alone had a sensitivity of 40.81%; specificity, 79.31%; positive predictive value, 62.50%; and negative predictive value, 61.33%. The 4
symptom clusters alone discriminant function analyses had a sensitivity of 46.94%; specificity, 77.20%; positive predictive value,
63.90%; and negative predictive value, 62.86%. Discriminant function analyses of the 4 computerized neurocognitive scores alone
had a sensitivity of 53.20%; specificity, 75.44%; positive predictive value, 64.10%; and negative predictive value, 66.15%.
Conclusion: The use of computerized neurocognitive testing in conjunction with symptom clusters results improves sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of predicting protracted recovery compared with each used
alone. There is also a net increase in sensitivity of 24.41% when using neurocognitive testing and symptom clusters together
compared with using total symptoms on Post-Concussion Symptom Scale alone.
Keywords: concussion; prognosis; symptoms; neurocognitive testing
The Value Added of Neurocognitive Testing After Sports-Related Concussion
- Authors: Van Kampen, Lovell, Pardini, Collins, Fu
- Publication: The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Date: Jun 01, 2006
Abstract:
Neurocogntive testing has been endorsed as a 'cornerstone' of concussion management by recent Vienna and Prague meetings of the Concussion In Sport Group. Neurocognitive testing is important given the potential unreliability of athlete self-report after injury. Relying only on athletes' reports of symptoms may result in premature return of athletes to contact sport, potentially exposing them to additional injury.
ImPACT Normative Data for Children (Ages 11-14)
- Authors: Lovell, Collins, Maroon
- Publication: The ImPACT Test
- Date: May 18, 2006
Abstract:
Normative Data for the ImPACT Composite Scores
A sample of 205 elementary, junior high, and high school students was initially used for this project. Three of these subjects had incomplete test data and were subsequently dropped from the normative sample. The current normative sample consists of 102 boys and 100 girls between the ages of 11 and 14. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to allow an analysis of performance differences between gender and age across multiple neuropsychological domains.